Continuous engagement
Engagement isn’t an annual event. Now measuring it isn’t either.
Surveys show how people felt the day they answered. Relate measures engagement continuously, from the meetings your teams already have, so you see trends as they happen.
- Your feedback stays yours
- Teams and departments, never individuals
- Works with Zoom, Teams and Meet
By department · last 12 weeks
- Customer Success
- Product
- Company
- Operations
- Recognition↓ 8Company-wide
- Follow-through↑ 5Company-wide
- Voice→ 0Company-wide
Aggregate and thematic. Teams and departments of 5+ only.
Why point-in-time stopped working
It arrives too late
Results land six weeks after the survey closes, about a team that already changed.
People answer safe
The people you most need to hear from skip it, or say what’s safe.
Nothing changes after
Action plans turn into “improve communication” and retire in a shared drive.
More pulses aren’t continuous
Asking more often doesn’t fix lag or response bias. It adds to both.
Same questions, answered continuously
- Your survey asks
“I receive recognition for good work.”
Relate measures
Specific recognition named in meetings, across the team, week by week
- Your survey asks
“My opinions seem to count.”
Relate measures
Ideas acknowledged in the room and referenced later
- Your survey asks
“I can raise problems and tough issues.”
Relate measures
Disagreement voiced with the manager present, and how fast it gets addressed
- Your survey asks
“My manager cares about me as a person.”
Relate measures
One-on-one coverage and listening patterns across the team
- Your survey asks
“Someone encourages my development.”
Relate measures
Career conversations in one-on-ones and stretch work assigned, team-wide
- Your survey asks
“I expect to be here in two years.”
Relate measures
Whether teams still talk about plans and commitments in the future tense
Point-in-time vs. continuous
Point-in-time surveys
- Data sourceEmployee self-report (survey or pulse)
- FrequencyScheduled or event-triggered
- Employee burdenRequires active participation
- Lag timeDays to weeks between event and insight
- What it measuresHow employees say they feel
- Manager accountabilitySelf-assessed or peer-reported
- PredictiveLooks back at how people felt
- Org benchmarkingDepends on response rates
Relate (continuous)
- Data sourceBehavioral and vocal signals from live meetings
- FrequencyContinuous: every meeting generates data
- Employee burdenZero. No forms, no prompts
- Lag timeFeedback after each meeting
- What it measuresWhat employees and managers actually do
- Manager accountabilityFollow-through and communication patterns
- PredictiveFlags risk early: slipping one-on-ones, quieter voices, attrition signals
- Org benchmarkingBuilt from every participating meeting
It’s budget season. Put the money somewhere that looks forward.
Run Relate on real teams for one quarter: a continuous engagement score, early warnings and coaching after every meeting. If it doesn’t tell you more than your last survey did, walk away. If it does, every dollar goes toward year one.
Product previews on this page use synthetic teams and figures.